design: be important in curriculum

Related concepts

Parents	cost Weight: 0.64 , industry Weight: 0.63 , approach Weight: 0.63 , layout Weight: 0.62
Siblings	architect Weight: 0.71 , design pattern Weight: 0.69 , prototype Weight: 0.63 , chevron Weight: 0.62 , logo Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in curriculum	1.00
be important teaching	0.84
be important in teaching	0.84
be important in schools	0.81
be taught to architecture students	0.79
need math	0.78
be important in primary schools	0.78
use math	0.76
is learning	0.76
use algebra	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(approach, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(design, be important in curriculum)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(approach, be important teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(design, be important in curriculum)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(approach, is learning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(design, be important in curriculum)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(approach, be important teaching)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(approach, be important in teaching)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(approach, is learning)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(approach, be important in teaching)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(approach, be important teaching)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(approach, is learning)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(architect, use algebra)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(architect, use math)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(architect, need math)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(approach, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(design, be important in curriculum)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(approach, be important teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(design, be important in curriculum)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(approach, is learning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(design, be important in curriculum)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(architect, need math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(architect, need math)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(architect, use math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(architect, use math)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(architect, use algebra) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(architect, use algebra)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(design, be important in curriculum)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(design, be important in schools)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(design, be taught to architecture students)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(design, be important in primary schools)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in schools)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(design, be important in schools)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(design, be taught to architecture students)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in primary schools)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(design, be taught to architecture students)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(design, be important in schools)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(design, be important in primary schools)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(design, be taught to architecture students)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(design, be important in primary schools)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(design, be important in curriculum)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(approach, is learning)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(approach, be important teaching)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(approach, be important in teaching)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(architect, use algebra)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(architect, use math)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(architect, need math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(approach, be important teaching)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(approach, be important in teaching)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(design, be important in curriculum) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(approach, is learning)