design: be important in manufacturing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in manufacturing 1.00
be made without manufacturing machines 0.87
be used in industrial manufacture 0.86
have important to manufacturing firm estimation 0.86
be used in manufacture 0.80
is factory 0.79
be important in business 0.78
be important to company 0.77
be such problem for manufacturers 0.77
be important for business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cost, have important to manufacturing firm estimation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(design, be important in manufacturing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(design, be important in manufacturing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cost, have important to manufacturing firm estimation)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cost, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cost, have important to manufacturing firm estimation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(prototype, be made without manufacturing machines)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(prototype, be used in industrial manufacture)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, is factory)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(logo, be important for business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(logo, be important to company)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prototype, be used in manufacture)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cost, have important to manufacturing firm estimation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(prototype, be made without manufacturing machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(prototype, be made without manufacturing machines)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(prototype, be used in manufacture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(prototype, be used in manufacture)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(prototype, be used in industrial manufacture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(prototype, be used in industrial manufacture)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(logo, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(logo, be important to company)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(logo, be important for business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(design pattern, is factory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(design pattern, is factory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(design, be important in manufacturing)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(design, be such problem for manufacturers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(design, be such problem for manufacturers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(design, be important in business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(design, be such problem for manufacturers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(design, be important in business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(design, be important in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(design, be such problem for manufacturers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(design, be important in manufacturing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cost, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cost, have important to manufacturing firm estimation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(prototype, be used in manufacture)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(prototype, be made without manufacturing machines)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(prototype, be used in industrial manufacture)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(logo, be important to company)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(design pattern, is factory)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(logo, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cost, be important in business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(design, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cost, have important to manufacturing firm estimation)