design: be important in theatre

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in theatre 1.00
be important 40 0.98
be important today 0.90
be important for us 0.88
is most important 0.87
be important in life 0.87
be important for country 0.86
be important to country 0.85
be important in business 0.84
be important for business 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(industry, be important for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design, be important in theatre)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(industry, be important for country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design, be important in theatre)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design, be important in theatre)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(industry, be important 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design, be important in theatre)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(industry, be important to country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design, be important in theatre)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(industry, be important 40)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cost, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(industry, be important for us)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(industry, be important for country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important 40)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important for us)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important for country)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(logo, be important for business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(logo, is most important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(industry, be important for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(design, be important in theatre)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(industry, be important 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(design, be important in theatre)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(industry, be important for country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(design, be important in theatre)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(design, be important in theatre)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(industry, be important to country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(design, be important in theatre)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(logo, is most important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(logo, is most important)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(logo, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(logo, be important for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(design, be important in theatre)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(design, be important in business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(design, be important today)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(design, be important in life)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(design, be important in business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(design, be important today)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design, be important in life)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design, be important today)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in life)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(design, be important today)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(design, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(design, be important in life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design, be important in theatre)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, be important to country)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(industry, be important for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(industry, be important for country)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cost, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(logo, is most important)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(logo, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, be important to country)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(industry, be important for us)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(industry, be important for country)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(design, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cost, be important in business)