design: be used

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used 1.00
have used for portfollios 0.93
use yellowtrace 0.83
use quadrilaterals 0.83
use gmos 0.83
want use 0.78
be used in manufacture 0.76
used calculate 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(industry, use gmos)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(design, be used)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(industry, want use)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(design, be used)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(approach, used calculate)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(design, be used)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(approach, used calculate)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(industry, use gmos)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(industry, want use)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(industry, use gmos)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(industry, want use)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(approach, used calculate)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(architect, use yellowtrace)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(architect, use quadrilaterals)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prototype, be used in manufacture)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(industry, use gmos)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(design, be used)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(industry, want use)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(design, be used)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(approach, used calculate)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(design, be used)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(architect, use yellowtrace)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(architect, use yellowtrace)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(architect, use quadrilaterals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(architect, use quadrilaterals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(prototype, be used in manufacture)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(prototype, be used in manufacture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(design, be used)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(design, have used for portfollios)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(design, have used for portfollios)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(design, have used for portfollios)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, be used)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(design, be used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(approach, used calculate)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(industry, want use)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(industry, use gmos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(prototype, be used in manufacture)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(architect, use yellowtrace)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(architect, use quadrilaterals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(approach, used calculate)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(industry, want use)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(design, be used)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(industry, use gmos)