design: have used for portfollios

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
have used for portfollios 1.00
be used 0.93
use yellowtrace 0.82
use quadrilaterals 0.82
use gmos 0.82
want use 0.80
were able 0.77
is needed 0.76
were made invented 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(industry, use gmos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(design, have used for portfollios)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(industry, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(design, have used for portfollios)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(approach, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(design, have used for portfollios)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(industry, use gmos)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(approach, is needed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(industry, want use)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(industry, use gmos)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(industry, want use)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(approach, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(architect, use yellowtrace)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(architect, use quadrilaterals)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(logo, were made invented)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(architect, were able)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(architect, is needed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(logo, is needed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(prototype, is needed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(industry, use gmos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(design, have used for portfollios)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(industry, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(design, have used for portfollios)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(approach, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(design, have used for portfollios)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(architect, use yellowtrace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(architect, use yellowtrace)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(architect, use quadrilaterals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(architect, use quadrilaterals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(prototype, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(prototype, is needed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(logo, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(logo, is needed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(architect, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(architect, is needed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(architect, were able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(architect, were able)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(logo, were made invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(logo, were made invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(design, have used for portfollios)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(design, be used)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, be used)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(design, be used)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(design, be used)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(design, is needed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(design, is needed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(design, is needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(design, have used for portfollios)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(approach, is needed)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(industry, want use)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(industry, use gmos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(prototype, is needed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(logo, is needed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(architect, is needed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(architect, use yellowtrace)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(architect, were able)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(architect, use quadrilaterals)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(logo, were made invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(approach, is needed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(industry, want use)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(design, have used for portfollios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(industry, use gmos)