design: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
be helpful 0.89
helpful for companies 0.79
be important 40 0.79
think useful methodology 0.78
be important in theatre 0.77
is interesting 0.76
is relevant 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(approach, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(design, is useful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(industry, be helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(design, is useful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(industry, be important 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(design, is useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(industry, be important 40)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(approach, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(industry, be helpful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important 40)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(approach, is useful)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(industry, be helpful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(prototype, is useful)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(approach, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(design, is useful)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(industry, be helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(design, is useful)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(industry, be important 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(design, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(design pattern, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(design pattern, is useful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(prototype, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(prototype, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(design, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in theatre)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, helpful for companies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, think useful methodology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(design, is interesting)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(design, be important in theatre)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(design, helpful for companies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(design, think useful methodology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(design, be important in theatre)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(design, is interesting)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(design, helpful for companies)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(design, think useful methodology)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(design, helpful for companies)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(design, think useful methodology)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(design, is interesting)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design, be important in theatre)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(design, is interesting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(design, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(design, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be helpful)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(approach, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(design pattern, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(prototype, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be helpful)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(approach, is useful)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(design, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)