design: think bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
think bad 1.00
is really best 0.83
need know 0.82
do 0.82
be really have better gas 0.82
has quality bad 0.79
be considered good 0.79
looks like like real life 0.79
is really best gas 0.79
be really have gas 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(chevron, be really have better gas)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, do)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chevron, be really have gas)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chevron, is really best gas)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chevron, is really best)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(logo, looks like like real life)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(architect, need know)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(architect, need know) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(architect, need know)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(architect, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, do)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(logo, looks like like real life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(logo, looks like like real life)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chevron, is really best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chevron, is really best)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(chevron, be really have better gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chevron, be really have better gas)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(design pattern, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(chevron, be really have gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(chevron, be really have gas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(chevron, is really best gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(chevron, is really best gas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(design, think bad)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(design, be considered good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(design, be considered good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(design, be considered good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design, be considered good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(design, think bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(architect, do)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(architect, need know)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chevron, be really have better gas)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(chevron, be really have gas)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(logo, looks like like real life)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chevron, is really best)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chevron, is really best gas)