desk: be top computers used

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents home office
Weight: 0.61
, object
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.57
, comfort
Weight: 0.56
Siblings doorknob
Weight: 0.33
, couch
Weight: 0.33
, fountain pen
Weight: 0.32
, bookshelf
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be top computers used 1.00
be top computers 0.98
be computers used 0.94
be computers 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(desk, be top computers used)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(desk, be top computers)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(desk, be computers used)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(desk, be computers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(desk, be computers used)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(desk, be computers used)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(desk, be top computers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(desk, be computers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(desk, be computers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(desk, be top computers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(desk, be top computers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(desk, be computers used)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(desk, be computers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(desk, be top computers used)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(desk, be top computers used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(desk, be top computers used)