:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desk, is made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(desk, is made)
Similarity expansion
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(desk, is made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(desk, be made)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(desk, is made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(desk, be made)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desk, is made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(desk, be made)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(desk, is made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(desk, be made)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(desk, is made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(desk, is made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(desk, is made)
Typical implies Plausible
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(desk, is made)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(desk, is made)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings