desktop: is then laptops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web browser
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.65
, electronic device
Weight: 0.64
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.62
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.61
Siblings computer keyboard
Weight: 0.67
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.38
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is then laptops 1.00
is laptops 0.97
be better than laptops 0.93
be faster than laptops 0.91
is smarter then laptops 0.90
be cheaper than laptops 0.90
be more common than laptops 0.90
be more powerful than laptops 0.89
be expensive than laptop 0.88
is smarter laptops 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(desktop, is then laptops)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(desktop, is then laptops)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(desktop, is then laptops)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(desktop, is laptops)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(desktop, be faster than laptops)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(desktop, be more powerful than laptops)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(desktop, is laptops)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(desktop, is laptops)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(desktop, be cheaper than laptops)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(desktop, be better than laptops)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(desktop, is smarter laptops)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(desktop, be expensive than laptop)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(desktop, is smarter then laptops)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(desktop, be more common than laptops)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(desktop, is laptops)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(desktop, be faster than laptops)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(desktop, be more powerful than laptops)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desktop, be faster than laptops)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(desktop, be expensive than laptop)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(desktop, be better than laptops)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(desktop, be cheaper than laptops)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(desktop, be more powerful than laptops)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(desktop, be better than laptops)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(desktop, be more common than laptops)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(desktop, be expensive than laptop)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(desktop, is smarter laptops)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(desktop, is smarter then laptops)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(desktop, be more common than laptops)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(desktop, be better than laptops)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(desktop, be cheaper than laptops)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(desktop, be more common than laptops)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(desktop, is smarter then laptops)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(desktop, be faster than laptops)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(desktop, is smarter laptops)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(desktop, be expensive than laptop)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(desktop, is smarter then laptops)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(desktop, be more powerful than laptops)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(desktop, be cheaper than laptops)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(desktop, is smarter laptops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(desktop, is then laptops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(desktop, is then laptops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(desktop, is then laptops)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)