dessert: is served

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit salad
Weight: 0.75
, recipe
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.63
, entree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.84
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.79
, flan
Weight: 0.79
, custard
Weight: 0.76
, apple pie
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
is served 1.00
be served 1.00
is served last 0.95
be served at end 0.92
be typically served 0.89
be served with cheese 0.86
be served at end of meal 0.85
be served with pickle 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fruit salad, be served)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dessert, is served)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fruit salad, be typically served)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dessert, is served)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(sandwich, be served with pickle)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dessert, is served)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be served with pickle)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, be served)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, be typically served)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be served with pickle)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, be typically served)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, be served)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, be served with cheese)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fruit salad, be served)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(dessert, is served)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fruit salad, be typically served)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(dessert, is served)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(sandwich, be served with pickle)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(dessert, is served)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(apple pie, be served with cheese)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(apple pie, be served with cheese)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(dessert, is served)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is served last)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be served at end)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(dessert, be served at end)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(dessert, be served at end)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(dessert, be served at end)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(dessert, be served at end of meal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be served at end of meal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(dessert, be served at end of meal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(dessert, is served last)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(dessert, be served at end of meal)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dessert, is served last)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dessert, is served last)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is served)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dessert, is served)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fruit salad, be served)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sandwich, be served with pickle)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fruit salad, be typically served)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(apple pie, be served with cheese)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fruit salad, be served)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sandwich, be served with pickle)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(dessert, is served)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fruit salad, be typically served)