destroyer: be better than battleships

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vessel
Weight: 0.77
, warship
Weight: 0.66
, task force
Weight: 0.54
, submarine
Weight: 0.54
Siblings frigate
Weight: 0.54
, cargo ship
Weight: 0.37
, schooner
Weight: 0.36
, blood vessel
Weight: 0.36
, sailboat
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than battleships 1.00
be vs battleship 0.83
boats rather than ships 0.83
be more dangerous than ships 0.81
be more dangerous than regular ships 0.80
be different from submarines 0.80
be different from early submarines 0.79
be called submarines 0.79
be called destroyers 0.78
be called submarine 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(submarine, be different from early submarines)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(destroyer, be better than battleships)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(submarine, be called submarines)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(destroyer, be better than battleships)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(submarine, be called submarines)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(submarine, be different from early submarines)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(submarine, be different from early submarines)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(submarine, be called submarines)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(submarine, be different from early submarines)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(destroyer, be better than battleships)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(submarine, be called submarines)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(destroyer, be better than battleships)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(destroyer, be better than battleships)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(destroyer, be called destroyers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(destroyer, be vs battleship)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(destroyer, be vs battleship)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(destroyer, be called destroyers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(destroyer, be called destroyers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(destroyer, be vs battleship)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(destroyer, be called destroyers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(destroyer, be vs battleship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(destroyer, be better than battleships)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(destroyer, be better than battleships)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(submarine, be called submarines)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(submarine, be different from early submarines)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(submarine, be called submarines)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(destroyer, be better than battleships)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(submarine, be different from early submarines)