detail: be from same advisor different

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.63
, explanation
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
Siblings social security number
Weight: 0.67
, cover
Weight: 0.64
, line item
Weight: 0.62
, visibility
Weight: 0.62
, bay window
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from same advisor different 1.00
be from same advisor 0.99
be from advisor different 0.99
be from advisor 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(detail, be from same advisor different)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(detail, be from same advisor)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(detail, be from advisor different)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(detail, be from same advisor)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(detail, be from advisor different)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(detail, be from advisor)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(detail, be from advisor)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(detail, be from same advisor)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(detail, be from advisor different)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(detail, be from advisor)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(detail, be from same advisor)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(detail, be from advisor different)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(detail, be from advisor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(detail, be from same advisor different)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(detail, be from same advisor different)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(detail, be from same advisor different)