detective: be called sleuths

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents investigator
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.61
, officer
Weight: 0.61
, specialist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings narrator
Weight: 0.52
, police officer
Weight: 0.38
, lieutenant
Weight: 0.35
, warrant officer
Weight: 0.35
, constable
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called sleuths 1.00
be called gumshoes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(investigator, be called gumshoes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(detective, be called sleuths)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(detective, be called sleuths)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(investigator, be called gumshoes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(detective, be called sleuths)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(investigator, be called gumshoes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(investigator, be called gumshoes)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(detective, be called sleuths)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(detective, be called sleuths)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(detective, be called sleuths)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(detective, be called sleuths)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(detective, be called sleuths)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(detective, be called gumshoes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(detective, be called sleuths)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(detective, be called gumshoes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(detective, be called sleuths)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(detective, be called gumshoes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(detective, be called sleuths)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(detective, be called gumshoes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(detective, be called sleuths)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(detective, be called sleuths)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(detective, be called sleuths)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(detective, be called sleuths)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(detective, be called sleuths)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(detective, be called sleuths)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(investigator, be called gumshoes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(detective, be called sleuths)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(investigator, be called gumshoes)