detective: be obsessed with casting a-listers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents investigator
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.61
, officer
Weight: 0.61
, specialist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings narrator
Weight: 0.52
, police officer
Weight: 0.38
, lieutenant
Weight: 0.35
, warrant officer
Weight: 0.35
, constable
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be obsessed with casting a-listers 1.00
have cast 0.82
have new cast 0.82
be obsessed with a-listers 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(detective, have cast)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(detective, have cast)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(detective, have cast)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(detective, have new cast)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(detective, be obsessed with a-listers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(detective, have new cast)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(detective, be obsessed with a-listers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(detective, have new cast)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(detective, be obsessed with a-listers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(detective, have new cast)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(detective, be obsessed with a-listers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(detective, have cast)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(detective, be obsessed with casting a-listers)