developer: damage to hair

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents third party
Weight: 0.59
, programmer
Weight: 0.57
, business people
Weight: 0.57
, party
Weight: 0.56
, expert
Weight: 0.56
Siblings builder
Weight: 0.33
, realtor
Weight: 0.32
, publisher
Weight: 0.32
, engineer
Weight: 0.32
, operator
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
damage to hair 1.00
be in hair 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(developer, damage to hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(developer, damage to hair)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(developer, damage to hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(developer, be in hair)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(developer, damage to hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(developer, be in hair)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(developer, damage to hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(developer, be in hair)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(developer, damage to hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(developer, be in hair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(developer, damage to hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(developer, damage to hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(developer, damage to hair)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(developer, damage to hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(developer, damage to hair)