development: affect environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect environment 1.00
affect climate 0.87
be bad for environment 0.87
be different in dynamic uncertain environment 0.81
affect development 0.80
negatively can affect soil 0.79
impact business 0.78
affect social development 0.77
be very important to ecosystem 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(aspect, affect climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(development, affect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(process, be different in dynamic uncertain environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(development, affect environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(process, be very important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(development, affect environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(aspect, affect climate)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(process, be different in dynamic uncertain environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(process, be very important to ecosystem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(process, be very important to ecosystem)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(process, be different in dynamic uncertain environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(aspect, affect climate)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, impact business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(aspect, affect climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(development, affect environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(process, be different in dynamic uncertain environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(development, affect environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(process, be very important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(development, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, impact business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, impact business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(development, affect environment)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(development, be bad for environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(development, be bad for environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(development, negatively can affect soil)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(development, affect social development)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect social development)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(development, negatively can affect soil)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(development, affect social development)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(development, negatively can affect soil)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(development, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(development, affect social development)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(development, negatively can affect soil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(development, affect environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(development, affect environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(aspect, affect climate)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(process, be different in dynamic uncertain environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(process, be very important to ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, impact business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(aspect, affect climate)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(process, be different in dynamic uncertain environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(development, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(process, be very important to ecosystem)