development: be funded in long-term

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be funded in long-term 1.00
be funded 1.00
be in search industry funded 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(development, be funded in long-term) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(development, be funded in long-term)

Similarity expansion

0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(development, be funded in long-term) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(development, be funded)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(development, be funded in long-term) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(development, be funded)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(development, be funded in long-term) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(development, be funded)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(development, be funded in long-term) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(development, be in search industry funded)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(development, be funded in long-term) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(development, be in search industry funded)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(development, be funded in long-term) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(development, be in search industry funded)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(development, be funded in long-term) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(development, be funded)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(development, be funded in long-term) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(development, be in search industry funded)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(development, be funded in long-term) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(development, be funded in long-term) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(development, be funded in long-term)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(development, be funded in long-term) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(development, be funded in long-term)