development: be important at present

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important at present 1.00
be important in counselling 0.83
be important day 0.79
be important for life 0.76
be important for country 0.76
be important in country 0.76
be important in things 0.75
be important as related 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(step, be important day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(development, be important at present)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(step, be important day)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(step, be important day)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(step, be important day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(development, be important at present)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(development, be important at present)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(development, be important in counselling)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in counselling)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(development, be important in country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(development, be important for country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(development, be important for country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(development, be important in counselling)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(development, be important in country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(development, be important for country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(development, be important in counselling)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(development, be important in country)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(development, be important for country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important at present)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(development, be important at present)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(step, be important day)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(development, be important at present) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(step, be important day)