development: be important in biology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in biology 1.00
be in genetics 0.80
were in astronomy important 0.78
be important for prokaryotic life 0.78
be in genetics helping 0.77
be important for organisms 0.77
be important for humans 0.77
be made in field of mathematics 0.77
be important for unicellular organisms 0.76
be important for living organisms 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(discovery, be made in field of mathematics)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(discovery, were in astronomy important)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important for prokaryotic life)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important for living organisms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important for organisms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important for unicellular organisms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important for humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(discovery, were in astronomy important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(discovery, were in astronomy important)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cell division, be important for humans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important for humans)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cell division, be important for unicellular organisms)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important for unicellular organisms)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cell division, be important for organisms)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important for organisms)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cell division, be important for prokaryotic life)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important for prokaryotic life)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cell division, be important for living organisms)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important for living organisms)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(discovery, be made in field of mathematics)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(discovery, be made in field of mathematics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(development, be important in biology)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(development, be in genetics helping)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(development, be in genetics helping)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(development, be in genetics helping)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(development, be in genetics helping)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(development, be important in biology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(discovery, were in astronomy important)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(discovery, be made in field of mathematics)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cell division, be important for unicellular organisms)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cell division, be important for organisms)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cell division, be important for humans)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cell division, be important for living organisms)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cell division, be important for prokaryotic life)