development: be important to company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to company 1.00
be important in business 0.84
be important to business 0.84
be very profitable for companies 0.83
be very profitable for pharmaceutical companies 0.81
be important in sales 0.77
be important in counselling 0.77
be important for employees 0.77
think important in operations management 0.76
be more important than product 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(development, be important to company)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aspect, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(development, be important to company)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(process, think important in operations management)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(development, be important to company)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(development, be important to company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aspect, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(process, be more important than product)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(process, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(process, think important in operations management)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(aspect, be important to business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(process, be important in business)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(process, think important in operations management)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(process, be more important than product)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(discovery, be important in sales)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(development, be important to company)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aspect, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(development, be important to company)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(process, think important in operations management)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(development, be important to company)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(development, be important to company)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(discovery, be important in sales)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(discovery, be important in sales)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(development, be important to company)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(development, be very profitable for pharmaceutical companies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(development, be very profitable for pharmaceutical companies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in counselling)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(development, be important for employees)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(development, be important in counselling)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(development, be important for employees)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(development, be very profitable for pharmaceutical companies)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(development, be important in counselling)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(development, be important for employees)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(development, be very profitable for pharmaceutical companies)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(development, be important for employees)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(development, be important in counselling)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(development, be important to company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(process, be more important than product)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(aspect, be important to business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(process, think important in operations management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(discovery, be important in sales)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(process, be more important than product)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(aspect, be important to business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(development, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(process, think important in operations management)