development: be important to human service field

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to human service field 1.00
be important to service field 0.94
is human 0.80
be important to human resource management 0.80
be made in field 0.78
be important for life 0.77
be important for humans 0.76
be in human beings important 0.76
be essential for life 0.76
be important in business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(development, be important to human service field)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(process, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(process, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(discovery, be made in field)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be essential for life)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important for humans)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be in human beings important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(development, be important to human service field)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cell division, be in human beings important)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cell division, be in human beings important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(discovery, be made in field)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(discovery, be made in field)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cell division, be important for humans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important for humans)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cell division, be essential for life)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cell division, be essential for life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(development, be important to human service field)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(development, is human)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(development, is human)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(development, is human)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(development, be important to human resource management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(development, be important to human resource management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(development, be important to human resource management)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human resource management)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, is human)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(development, be important to human service field)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cell division, be in human beings important)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(discovery, be made in field)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cell division, be important for humans)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cell division, be essential for life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(development, be important to human service field)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)