development: be in nation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in nation 1.00
is country 0.87
be important in country 0.84
be important for country 0.83
be important in world 0.79
was during thecold war in world countries 0.78
was during war in world countries 0.78
was during war in third world countries 0.78
was during thecold war in third world countries 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(development, be in nation)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(development, was during thecold war in third world countries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(development, be important for country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in world)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(development, was during thecold war in third world countries)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(development, was during thecold war in third world countries)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(development, be important in country)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(development, be important in country)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(development, be important in country)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(development, be important in world)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(development, be important in world)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(development, be important in world)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(development, be important for country)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(development, be important for country)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(development, be important for country)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(development, was during thecold war in third world countries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be in nation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(development, be in nation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(development, be in nation)