development: be in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in uk 1.00
be in india 0.82
be managed in windows xp 0.77
be for cs 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(process, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(development, be in uk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(process, be managed in windows xp)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(development, be in uk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(development, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(process, be in uk)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(development, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(process, be managed in windows xp)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(process, be managed in windows xp)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(process, be in uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(process, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(development, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(development, be in uk)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(process, be managed in windows xp)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(development, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(development, be in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(development, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(development, be in uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(development, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(development, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(development, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(development, be in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(process, be in uk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(process, be managed in windows xp)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(development, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(process, be in uk)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(development, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(process, be managed in windows xp)