development: be integral part of designing process of aerospace product

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be integral part of designing process of aerospace product 1.00
be integral part of process of aerospace product 0.97
be integral part of designing process 0.92
be integral part of process 0.86
is design 0.80
be involved in growth development 0.76
be vital process for organisms 0.76
be more important than product 0.76
be involved in growth development of organism 0.76
be important in business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(process, is design)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(process, is design)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(process, be more important than product)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(process, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(process, be important in business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(process, be more important than product)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(process, is design)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be involved in growth development of organism)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be vital process for organisms)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(process, is design)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cell division, be vital process for organisms)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cell division, be vital process for organisms)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(cell division, be involved in growth development of organism)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cell division, be involved in growth development of organism)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(process, is design)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(process, be more important than product)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cell division, be involved in growth development of organism)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cell division, be vital process for organisms)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(process, is design)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(process, be more important than product)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(development, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)