development: be linked to psychology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be linked to psychology 1.00
be in psychology 0.91
be in psychology measured 0.88
be linked to cell theory 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(development, be linked to psychology)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(discovery, be in psychology measured)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(development, be linked to psychology)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(discovery, be in psychology)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(development, be linked to psychology)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be linked to cell theory)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(development, be linked to psychology)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(discovery, be in psychology)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(discovery, be in psychology)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(development, be linked to psychology)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(discovery, be in psychology measured)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(discovery, be in psychology measured)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(development, be linked to psychology)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cell division, be linked to cell theory)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cell division, be linked to cell theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(development, be linked to psychology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(development, be linked to psychology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(development, be linked to psychology)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(development, be linked to psychology)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(development, be linked to psychology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(development, be linked to psychology)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(development, be linked to psychology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(development, be linked to psychology)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(discovery, be in psychology)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(development, be linked to psychology)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(discovery, be in psychology measured)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(development, be linked to psychology)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cell division, be linked to cell theory)