development: is continuous process

Related concepts

Parents	concept Weight: 0.63 , aspect Weight: 0.60 , step Weight: 0.60 , process Weight: 0.60
Siblings	acquisition Weight: 0.69 , artificial intelligence Weight: 0.64 , discovery Weight: 0.62 , well Weight: 0.60 , cell division Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is continuous process	1.00
is continuous	0.93
has physical part process	0.83
evaluation of be can ongoing process	0.83
is dynamic process	0.83
be important process for things	0.78
evaluation of be can process	0.78
be integral part of process	0.78
experience greater learning curves than automated process	0.77
is uneven process	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(development, is continuous process)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(process, experience greater learning curves than automated process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(development, is continuous process)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(development, is continuous process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(process, experience greater learning curves than automated process)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(process, experience greater learning curves than automated process)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can process)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(development, is continuous process)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(process, experience greater learning curves than automated process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(development, is continuous process)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(development, is continuous process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(development, is continuous process)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(development, has physical part process)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(development, is dynamic process)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(development, is uneven process)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(development, has physical part process)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(development, is dynamic process)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(development, has physical part process)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(development, is dynamic process)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.36

Salient(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(development, is uneven process)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(development, is uneven process)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

Salient(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(development, is dynamic process)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

Salient(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(development, has physical part process)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(development, is uneven process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

Salient(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(development, is continuous process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(development, is continuous process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can process)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(process, experience greater learning curves than automated process)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can process)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(development, is continuous process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(process, experience greater learning curves than automated process)