development: is human

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
is human 1.00
be in human beings important 0.89
be in human beings 0.88
be important to human resource management 0.82
be important to human service field 0.80
enjoy more rights than human beings 0.80
be important for humans 0.80
be important to humans 0.79
be to humans 0.79
differ from human intelligence 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(concept, enjoy more rights than human beings)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(development, is human)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(process, be to humans)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(development, is human)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(process, be to humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(concept, enjoy more rights than human beings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(concept, enjoy more rights than human beings)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(process, be to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important for humans)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important to humans)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, differ from human intelligence)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be in human beings important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(concept, enjoy more rights than human beings)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(development, is human)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(process, be to humans)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(development, is human)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cell division, be in human beings important)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cell division, be in human beings important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, differ from human intelligence)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, differ from human intelligence)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(cell division, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important to humans)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cell division, be important for humans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important for humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(development, is human)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human resource management)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human service field)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(development, be important to human resource management)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(development, be important to human service field)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(development, be important to human service field)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(development, be important to human resource management)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(development, be important to human service field)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(development, be important to human resource management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, is human)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(development, is human)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(process, be to humans)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(concept, enjoy more rights than human beings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, differ from human intelligence)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cell division, be in human beings important)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cell division, be important to humans)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cell division, be important for humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(process, be to humans)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(development, is human)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(concept, enjoy more rights than human beings)