device: be connected to computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.79
, network device
Weight: 0.78
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.77
, cartridge
Weight: 0.66
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.78
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.75
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.75
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.74
, hypodermic needle
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be connected to computer 1.00
be important to computer system 0.85
be more expensive than desktop computers with power 0.81
be more expensive than desktop computers 0.81
be recognized on computer networks 0.81
be better than computers 0.80
cost more than desktop computers 0.79
be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power 0.79
be charged via wireless connection 0.79
be charged via connection 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet computer, be better than computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(device, be connected to computer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tablet computer, be better than computers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tablet computer, be better than computers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet computer, be better than computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(device, be connected to computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(device, be connected to computer)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(device, be charged via wireless connection)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(device, be charged via wireless connection)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(device, be important to computer system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(device, be important to computer system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(device, be charged via wireless connection)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be charged via wireless connection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(device, be connected to computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tablet computer, be better than computers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(device, be connected to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tablet computer, be better than computers)