device: be recognized on computer networks

Related concepts

Parents	electronic device Weight: 0.79 , network device Weight: 0.78 , tablet computer Weight: 0.77 , cartridge Weight: 0.66
Siblings	laptop computer Weight: 0.78 , smoke detector Weight: 0.75 , computer keyboard Weight: 0.75 , computer monitor Weight: 0.74 , hypodermic needle Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be recognized on computer networks	1.00
be important to computer system	0.81
be connected to computer	0.81
be located in network	0.78
appear as one on router	0.76
be more expensive than desktop computers	0.76
be more expensive than desktop computers with power	0.76
be better than computers	0.76
be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(tablet computer, be better than computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(tablet computer, be better than computers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(tablet computer, be better than computers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(tablet computer, be better than computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(device, be recognized on computer networks)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(device, be located in network)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(device, be located in network)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(device, be located in network)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(device, be located in network)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(device, be connected to computer)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(device, be important to computer system)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(device, appear as one on router)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(device, appear as one on router)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(device, appear as one on router)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(device, be connected to computer)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(device, appear as one on router)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(device, be connected to computer)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(device, be important to computer system)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(tablet computer, be better than computers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(tablet computer, be better than computers)