diabetes: be cuased

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disease
Weight: 0.65
, heart disease
Weight: 0.65
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.65
, endocrine system
Weight: 0.65
, kidney
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, hypertension
Weight: 0.37
, lung cancer
Weight: 0.37
, dementia
Weight: 0.37
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be tramnsmitted 1.00
be dignosed 1.00
be cuased 1.00
affect being 0.79
affect well being 0.77
be considered under-reported 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dementia, affect well being)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(dementia, affect being)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(dementia, affect being) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(dementia, affect being)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dementia, affect well being) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(dementia, affect well being)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(diabetes, be cuased)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(diabetes, be dignosed)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(diabetes, be tramnsmitted)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(diabetes, be dignosed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(diabetes, be dignosed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(diabetes, be tramnsmitted)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(diabetes, be tramnsmitted)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(diabetes, be dignosed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(diabetes, be considered under-reported)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(diabetes, be considered under-reported)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(diabetes, be considered under-reported)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diabetes, be tramnsmitted)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(diabetes, be considered under-reported)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(diabetes, be cuased)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(diabetes, be cuased)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(dementia, affect being)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(diabetes, be cuased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(dementia, affect well being)