dialogue: be important in ecumenism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.62
, work
Weight: 0.60
, exchange
Weight: 0.60
, conversation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings discussion
Weight: 0.66
, republic
Weight: 0.59
, parmenides
Weight: 0.48
, framework
Weight: 0.33
, partnership
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in ecumenism 1.00
be important for abrahamic faiths 0.76
be important for faiths 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important for faiths)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important for abrahamic faiths)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(dialogue, be important for faiths)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(dialogue, be important for abrahamic faiths)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important for faiths)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important for abrahamic faiths)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important for abrahamic faiths)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important for faiths)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in ecumenism)