dialogue: be important in narrative

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.62
, work
Weight: 0.60
, exchange
Weight: 0.60
, conversation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings discussion
Weight: 0.66
, republic
Weight: 0.59
, parmenides
Weight: 0.48
, framework
Weight: 0.33
, partnership
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in narrative 1.00
be important in story 0.82
be in story 0.77
be used in story 0.77
be important in drama 0.75
be important in film 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(dialogue, be important in narrative)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(dialogue, be important in story)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in story)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dialogue, be in story)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in story)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(dialogue, be in story)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(dialogue, be used in story)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be in story)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(dialogue, be used in story)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be used in story)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(dialogue, be important in drama)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(dialogue, be important in film)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in drama)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in film)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in film)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in drama)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in story)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in drama)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in film)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be in story)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be used in story)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in narrative)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in narrative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in narrative)