dialogue: be used in film

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.62
, work
Weight: 0.60
, exchange
Weight: 0.60
, conversation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings discussion
Weight: 0.66
, republic
Weight: 0.59
, parmenides
Weight: 0.48
, framework
Weight: 0.33
, partnership
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in film 1.00
be in pre-1970 's film 0.96
be important in film 0.94
be in movies 0.84
be low in movies 0.79
be quiet in movies 0.78
be in pornos 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(conversation, be in pornos)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dialogue, be used in film)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(conversation, be in pornos)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in pornos)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(conversation, be in pornos)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be used in film)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(dialogue, be used in film)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(dialogue, be in pre-1970 's film)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be in movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(dialogue, be in movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be in pre-1970 's film)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be in pre-1970 's film)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dialogue, be in movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dialogue, be in pre-1970 's film)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(dialogue, be low in movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be low in movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be low in movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(dialogue, be quiet in movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be quiet in movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be quiet in movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(dialogue, be low in movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dialogue, be quiet in movies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in film)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(dialogue, be important in film)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in film)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in film)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be used in film)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dialogue, be used in film)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(conversation, be in pornos)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dialogue, be used in film)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(conversation, be in pornos)