dialogue: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.62
, work
Weight: 0.60
, exchange
Weight: 0.60
, conversation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings discussion
Weight: 0.66
, republic
Weight: 0.59
, parmenides
Weight: 0.48
, framework
Weight: 0.33
, partnership
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality right 0.88
is poor 0.78
be good for business 0.76
be good in business 0.76
has quality questions 0.75
is good thing 0.75
is poor country 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dialogue, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(exchange, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dialogue, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dialogue, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(strategy, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(exchange, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(exchange, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(republic, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(republic, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(republic, is poor country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(republic, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good for business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be good in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(exchange, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(partnership, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(discussion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(republic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(republic, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(republic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(republic, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(partnership, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(framework, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(framework, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(framework, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(framework, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality questions)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(partnership, be good in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good in business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(partnership, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(partnership, be good for business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(republic, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(republic, is poor)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(republic, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(republic, is poor country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(dialogue, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dialogue, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(exchange, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(republic, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality questions)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(republic, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(framework, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(framework, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(republic, is poor country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, be good in business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(partnership, be good for business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(republic, is poor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(exchange, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)