dialogue: is ethical task

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.62
, work
Weight: 0.60
, exchange
Weight: 0.60
, conversation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings discussion
Weight: 0.66
, republic
Weight: 0.59
, parmenides
Weight: 0.48
, framework
Weight: 0.33
, partnership
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is ethical task 1.00
is ethical 0.87
is task 0.87
have ethical value 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dialogue, is ethical task)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(dialogue, is ethical task)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(dialogue, is ethical task)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(dialogue, is task)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(dialogue, is ethical task)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(dialogue, is task)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dialogue, is ethical task)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(dialogue, is task)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(dialogue, is ethical task)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(dialogue, is ethical)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(dialogue, is ethical task)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(dialogue, is ethical)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dialogue, is ethical task)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(dialogue, is ethical)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(dialogue, is ethical task)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, is ethical)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(dialogue, is ethical task)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, is task)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(dialogue, is ethical task)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dialogue, is ethical task)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, is ethical task)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dialogue, is ethical task)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dialogue, is ethical task)