diameter: affect system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.67
, length
Weight: 0.65
, size
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings circumference
Weight: 0.54
, width
Weight: 0.37
, inch
Weight: 0.35
, radius
Weight: 0.34
, aperture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect system 1.00
affect dissolvining 0.87
affect electronegativity 0.87
affect 0.87
affect quality 0.82
affect time 0.82
affect change 0.81
be measured in system 0.81
affect force 0.80
affect business 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(diameter, affect system)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(length, be measured in system)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(diameter, affect system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(length, be measured in system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(factor, affect business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(length, be measured in system)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(radius, affect electronegativity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(radius, affect force)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(aperture, affect quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(aperture, affect)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(diameter, affect system)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(length, be measured in system)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(diameter, affect system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(aperture, affect)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(aperture, affect)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(aperture, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(aperture, affect quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(radius, affect electronegativity)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(radius, affect electronegativity)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(radius, affect force)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(radius, affect force)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(diameter, affect system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diameter, affect system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(diameter, affect system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(length, be measured in system)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(aperture, affect)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(aperture, affect quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(radius, affect force)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(radius, affect electronegativity)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(length, be measured in system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(diameter, affect system)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)