diameter: be vs radius

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.67
, length
Weight: 0.65
, size
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings circumference
Weight: 0.54
, width
Weight: 0.37
, inch
Weight: 0.35
, radius
Weight: 0.34
, aperture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs radius 1.00
is double radius 0.86
has physical part radius 0.86
be vs circumference 0.82
be vs width 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(diameter, be vs radius)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(diameter, is double radius)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(diameter, has physical part radius)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(diameter, is double radius)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(diameter, is double radius)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(diameter, has physical part radius)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(diameter, has physical part radius)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(diameter, be vs circumference)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(diameter, be vs width)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(diameter, be vs circumference)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(diameter, be vs width)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(diameter, be vs circumference)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(diameter, be vs width)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(diameter, is double radius)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(diameter, has physical part radius)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(diameter, be vs width)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(diameter, be vs circumference)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(diameter, be vs radius)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(diameter, be vs radius) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(diameter, be vs radius)