diameter: be vs width

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.67
, length
Weight: 0.65
, size
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings circumference
Weight: 0.54
, width
Weight: 0.37
, inch
Weight: 0.35
, radius
Weight: 0.34
, aperture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs width 1.00
be related to width 0.90
exist without width 0.87
has magnitude width 0.85
be vs circumference 0.84
be vs radius 0.81
be related to thickness 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(length, be related to width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(diameter, be vs width)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(length, exist without width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(diameter, be vs width)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(length, exist without width)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(length, be related to width)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(length, exist without width)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(length, be related to width)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(length, be related to width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(diameter, be vs width)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(length, exist without width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(diameter, be vs width)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(diameter, be vs width)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(diameter, has magnitude width)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(diameter, has magnitude width)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(diameter, has magnitude width)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(diameter, be vs circumference)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(diameter, be vs radius)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(diameter, has magnitude width)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(diameter, be vs circumference)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(diameter, be vs radius)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(diameter, be vs circumference)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(diameter, be vs circumference)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(diameter, be vs radius)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(diameter, be vs radius)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(diameter, be vs width)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(diameter, be vs width)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(length, exist without width)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(length, be related to width)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(length, exist without width)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(diameter, be vs width) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(length, be related to width)