diamond: be at engagement ring

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.70
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.62
, jewel
Weight: 0.62
Siblings infield
Weight: 0.41
, quartz
Weight: 0.36
, garnet
Weight: 0.35
, emerald
Weight: 0.35
, tungsten
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at engagement ring 1.00
be at ring 0.82
be used to wed ring 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(diamond, be at engagement ring)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(diamond, be at engagement ring)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(diamond, be at engagement ring)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(diamond, be at ring)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(diamond, be at engagement ring)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(diamond, be used to wed ring)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(diamond, be at engagement ring)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be used to wed ring)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(diamond, be at engagement ring)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(diamond, be used to wed ring)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(diamond, be at engagement ring)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be at ring)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(diamond, be at engagement ring)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(diamond, be used to wed ring)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(diamond, be at engagement ring)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(diamond, be at ring)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(diamond, be at engagement ring)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(diamond, be at ring)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(diamond, be at engagement ring)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(diamond, be at engagement ring)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be at engagement ring)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(diamond, be at engagement ring)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(diamond, be at engagement ring)