diamond: be expensive

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.70
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.62
, jewel
Weight: 0.62
Siblings infield
Weight: 0.41
, quartz
Weight: 0.36
, garnet
Weight: 0.35
, emerald
Weight: 0.35
, tungsten
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive 1.00
be very expensive 0.94
be more expensive than sand 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(emerald, be very expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(emerald, be very expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(emerald, be very expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(diamond, be expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(diamond, be very expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(diamond, be very expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be very expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(diamond, be very expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(diamond, be more expensive than sand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diamond, be expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(emerald, be very expensive)