dick: be in da booty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents friend
Weight: 0.60
, writer
Weight: 0.59
, name
Weight: 0.59
, man
Weight: 0.58
Siblings alex
Weight: 0.54
, cunt
Weight: 0.34
, karl marx
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in da booty 1.00
was in da bungalow removed from tv 0.78
was in da bungalow 0.77
was in da bungalow removed 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(dick, be in da booty)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dick, was in da bungalow)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dick, was in da bungalow removed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dick, was in da bungalow)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(dick, was in da bungalow removed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(dick, was in da bungalow)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dick, was in da bungalow removed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(dick, was in da bungalow)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(dick, was in da bungalow removed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(dick, be in da booty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dick, be in da booty)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dick, be in da booty)