dick: was in da bungalow removed from tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents friend
Weight: 0.60
, writer
Weight: 0.59
, name
Weight: 0.59
, man
Weight: 0.58
Siblings alex
Weight: 0.54
, cunt
Weight: 0.34
, karl marx
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in da bungalow removed from tv 1.00
was in da bungalow removed 0.98
was in da bungalow 0.95
be in da booty 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dick, was in da bungalow removed)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dick, was in da bungalow)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dick, was in da bungalow removed)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(dick, was in da bungalow removed)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(dick, was in da bungalow)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(dick, was in da bungalow)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dick, be in da booty)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(dick, be in da booty)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dick, be in da booty)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(dick, was in da bungalow removed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dick, was in da bungalow)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(dick, be in da booty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dick, was in da bungalow removed from tv)