diet: be in developing countries poor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.63
, diabetes
Weight: 0.58
, trait
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taste
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.31
, attitude
Weight: 0.31
, consumption
Weight: 0.31
, flavor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in developing countries poor 1.00
be in countries poor 0.95
increase risk developing 0.81
compare across countries 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(diet, be in developing countries poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(attitude, compare across countries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(diet, be in developing countries poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(attitude, compare across countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(attitude, compare across countries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(diet, be in developing countries poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(diet, be in developing countries poor)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(diet, be in developing countries poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(diet, be in countries poor)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(diet, be in developing countries poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(diet, be in countries poor)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(diet, be in developing countries poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(diet, be in countries poor)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(diet, be in developing countries poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(diet, be in countries poor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(diet, be in developing countries poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(diet, be in developing countries poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(diet, be in developing countries poor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(diet, be in developing countries poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(diet, be in developing countries poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(diet, be in developing countries poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(attitude, compare across countries)