diet: has state problems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.63
, diabetes
Weight: 0.58
, trait
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taste
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.31
, attitude
Weight: 0.31
, consumption
Weight: 0.31
, flavor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problems 1.00
has state problem 0.93
cause problems 0.88
have foot problems 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(variable, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(diet, has state problems)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diet, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(variable, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(diet, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(variable, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(diet, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(consumption, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(variable, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(diet, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(diet, has state problems)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diet, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(consumption, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(consumption, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diet, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(diet, has state problems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(diet, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(diet, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(diet, has state problems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diet, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(diet, has state problems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(diet, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(variable, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(diet, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(consumption, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(diet, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(variable, has state problem)