difference: be in levels of economic development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, need
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.60
, consideration
Weight: 0.59
Siblings different people
Weight: 0.58
, range
Weight: 0.58
, add
Weight: 0.57
, implication
Weight: 0.55
, magnitude
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in levels of economic development 1.00
have levels 0.82
need levels 0.82
affect economic impact 0.80
have impact on development 0.80
need different levels 0.79
affect culture on regional level 0.77
need levels of exercise 0.77
need different levels of exercise 0.76
affect culture on level 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(difference, be in levels of economic development)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(factor, have impact on development)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, have impact on development)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(different people, need levels of exercise)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(different people, need different levels of exercise)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(different people, need different levels)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(difference, be in levels of economic development)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(different people, need different levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(different people, need different levels)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(different people, need different levels of exercise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(different people, need different levels of exercise)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(different people, need levels of exercise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(different people, need levels of exercise)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(difference, be in levels of economic development)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(difference, affect culture on regional level)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(difference, affect culture on regional level)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(difference, affect culture on regional level)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(difference, affect culture on regional level)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in levels of economic development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(difference, be in levels of economic development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(different people, need different levels)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(different people, need different levels of exercise)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(different people, need levels of exercise)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(difference, be in levels of economic development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)