different people: appreciate different tastes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.64
, difference
Weight: 0.58
, heart
Weight: 0.55
, person
Weight: 0.53
, aspect
Weight: 0.52
Siblings arabs
Weight: 0.52
, good person
Weight: 0.35
, think
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
appreciate different tastes 1.00
appreciate tastes 0.99
have different tastes 0.93
prefer different tastes 0.92
have tastes 0.91
have different music tastes 0.90
prefer tastes 0.90
perceive differently tastes 0.89
have tastes in music 0.89
have music tastes 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(different people, appreciate different tastes)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(different people, have different tastes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(different people, have different tastes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(different people, prefer different tastes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(different people, have different music tastes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(different people, have tastes in music)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(different people, have different music tastes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(different people, perceive differently tastes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(different people, perceive differently tastes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(different people, have different tastes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(different people, have different tastes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(different people, prefer different tastes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(different people, prefer different tastes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(different people, have different music tastes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(different people, perceive differently tastes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(different people, have different music tastes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(different people, perceive differently tastes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(different people, prefer different tastes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(different people, have tastes in music)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(different people, have tastes in music)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(different people, have tastes in music)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(different people, appreciate different tastes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(different people, appreciate different tastes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(different people, appreciate different tastes)