different people: have different music tastes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.64
, difference
Weight: 0.58
, heart
Weight: 0.55
, person
Weight: 0.53
, aspect
Weight: 0.52
Siblings arabs
Weight: 0.52
, good person
Weight: 0.35
, think
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have different music tastes 1.00
have tastes in music 0.99
have music tastes 0.99
have different tastes 0.97
have tastes 0.95
prefer different tastes 0.93
prefer tastes 0.91
appreciate different tastes 0.90
perceive differently tastes 0.89
appreciate tastes 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(different people, have different music tastes)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(different people, have tastes in music)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(different people, have different tastes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(different people, prefer different tastes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(different people, appreciate different tastes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(different people, have different tastes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(different people, perceive differently tastes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(different people, have different tastes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(different people, have tastes in music)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(different people, have different tastes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(different people, perceive differently tastes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(different people, prefer different tastes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(different people, prefer different tastes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(different people, perceive differently tastes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(different people, appreciate different tastes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(different people, prefer different tastes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(different people, perceive differently tastes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(different people, appreciate different tastes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(different people, appreciate different tastes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(different people, have tastes in music)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(different people, have tastes in music)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(different people, have different music tastes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(different people, have different music tastes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(different people, have different music tastes)