different people: have tastes in music

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.64
, difference
Weight: 0.58
, heart
Weight: 0.55
, person
Weight: 0.53
, aspect
Weight: 0.52
Siblings arabs
Weight: 0.52
, good person
Weight: 0.35
, think
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have tastes in music 1.00
have music tastes 1.00
have different music tastes 0.99
have tastes 0.96
have different tastes 0.94
prefer tastes 0.91
prefer different tastes 0.90
appreciate different tastes 0.89
appreciate tastes 0.89
perceive differently tastes 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(different people, have tastes in music)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(different people, have different music tastes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(different people, have different tastes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(different people, have different music tastes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(different people, have different music tastes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(different people, have different tastes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(different people, perceive differently tastes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(different people, prefer different tastes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(different people, have different tastes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(different people, have different music tastes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(different people, have different tastes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(different people, prefer different tastes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(different people, appreciate different tastes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(different people, prefer different tastes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(different people, perceive differently tastes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(different people, prefer different tastes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(different people, appreciate different tastes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(different people, perceive differently tastes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(different people, appreciate different tastes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(different people, appreciate different tastes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(different people, perceive differently tastes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(different people, have tastes in music)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(different people, have tastes in music)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(different people, have tastes in music)