diffusion: is slow process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, process
Weight: 0.57
, layer
Weight: 0.56
, type
Weight: 0.55
Siblings extraction
Weight: 0.33
, oxidation
Weight: 0.33
, fluorescence
Weight: 0.33
, recombination
Weight: 0.33
, hydrolysis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is slow process 1.00
is slow 0.91
be important in process 0.87
has physical part process 0.84
be important in process of selection 0.79
is spontaneous process 0.79
be important in process of digestion 0.78
be described as process 0.78
be important in process of natural selection 0.78
is considered as processes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of natural selection)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, is considered as processes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(recombination, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(recombination, be important in process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(oxidation, is considered as processes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(oxidation, is considered as processes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(recombination, be important in process of natural selection)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(diffusion, is slow process)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(diffusion, has physical part process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diffusion, is slow)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(diffusion, is slow)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(diffusion, is slow)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(diffusion, has physical part process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(diffusion, be described as process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(diffusion, is spontaneous process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(diffusion, be important in process of digestion)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, is slow)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diffusion, be described as process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(diffusion, is spontaneous process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(diffusion, be described as process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(diffusion, is spontaneous process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(diffusion, be important in process of digestion)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(diffusion, be important in process of digestion)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, be important in process of digestion)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, is spontaneous process)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, be described as process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(diffusion, is slow process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(oxidation, is considered as processes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(recombination, be important in process)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(recombination, be important in process of selection)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(recombination, be important in process of natural selection)